Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROOSEVELT WARM SPRINGS LTAC HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROOSEVELT WARM SPRINGS LTAC HOSPITAL
CCN 112000 | GA | 28 beds | Current EBITDA $408K → Pro Forma $689K (+$280K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$408K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$280K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$689K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+549bps
Margin Improvement
$196K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$280K
Modeled Uplift
$175K
Risk-Adjusted
-$105K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$107K
+209bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$102K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$62K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+19bp
Total EBITDA Impact$280K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$98K$8K$107K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$102K$102K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$16K$46K$62K$196K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT49.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$27K$53K$80K$107K$107K$107K$107K
Cost to Collect$0$26K$51K$77K$102K$102K$102K$102K
A/R Days Reduction$0$21K$41K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$78K$155K$228K$280K$280K$280K$280K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $280K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.2x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x
9.0x54% / 8.8x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.8x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
11.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$408K$408K8.0%
Year 1$421K+$187K$608K11.9%
Year 2$433K+$280K$714K14.0%
Year 3$446K+$280K$727K14.2%
Year 4$460K+$280K$740K14.5%
Year 5$473K+$280K$754K14.8%
$4.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$8.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.2M
Value Created
$754K
Exit EBITDA
$650K
Organic Growth
$2.8M
RCM Value Creation
$754K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$53K$80K$107K$128K
Cost to Collect$51K$77K$102K$123K
A/R Days Reduction$31K$47K$62K$75K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$140K$210K$280K$336K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 73 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-20.1%-3.8%5.2%
P0
Net-to-Gross37.9%26.8%35.1%49.2%
P56
Occupancy34.0%23.1%40.6%59.6%
P41
Rev/Bed$182K$497K$717K$1.3M
P1
Exp/Bed$764K$577K$776K$1.2M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML