Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BROOKS COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BROOKS COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 111332 | GA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-378K → Pro Forma $229K (+$607K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-378K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$607K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$229K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$440K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$607K
Modeled Uplift
$387K
Risk-Adjusted
-$221K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$229K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$229K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$140K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$607K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$229K$229K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$221K$8K$229K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$35K$104K$140K$440K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$57K$115K$172K$229K$229K$229K$229K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$57K$114K$172K$229K$229K$229K$229K
A/R Days Reduction$0$47K$93K$140K$140K$140K$140K$140K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$166K$332K$493K$607K$607K$607K$607K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $607K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-13.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
20.4x
Headroom (turns)
314%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 314% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -13.9x, adding 112.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-378K$-378K-3.3%
Year 1$-389K+$405K$16K0.1%
Year 2$-401K+$607K$206K1.8%
Year 3$-413K+$607K$194K1.7%
Year 4$-425K+$607K$182K1.6%
Year 5$-438K+$607K$169K1.5%
$-3.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.6M
Value Created
$169K
Exit EBITDA
$-602K
Organic Growth
$6.1M
RCM Value Creation
$169K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$115K$172K$229K$275K
Denial Rate Reductio$114K$172K$229K$275K
A/R Days Reduction$70K$105K$140K$167K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$304K$456K$607K$729K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.3%-20.1%-3.8%5.5%
P52
Net-to-Gross47.0%28.7%36.6%50.7%
P66
Occupancy40.2%21.3%40.5%55.1%
P48
Rev/Bed$459K$489K$717K$1.3M
P20
Exp/Bed$474K$580K$776K$1.2M
P17

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML