Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HIGGINS GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HIGGINS GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 111320 | GA | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $8.7M → Pro Forma $10.9M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$671K
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$825K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$817K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$502K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$825K$825K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$794K$23K$817K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$127K$375K$502K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$206K$412K$619K$825K$825K$825K$825K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$204K$408K$612K$817K$817K$817K$817K
A/R Days Reduction$0$167K$335K$502K$502K$502K$502K$502K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$591K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x
9.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.7M$8.7M21.2%
Year 1$9.0M+$1.4M$10.4M25.3%
Year 2$9.3M+$2.2M$11.4M27.7%
Year 3$9.5M+$2.2M$11.7M28.4%
Year 4$9.8M+$2.2M$12.0M29.1%
Year 5$10.1M+$2.2M$12.3M29.8%
$87.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$135.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$47.9M
Value Created
$12.3M
Exit EBITDA
$13.9M
Organic Growth
$21.7M
RCM Value Creation
$12.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$412K$619K$825K$990K
Denial Rate Reductio$408K$612K$817K$980K
A/R Days Reduction$251K$376K$502K$602K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.2%-17.7%-3.8%4.9%
P92
Net-to-Gross31.3%28.7%36.5%50.7%
P32
Occupancy53.1%23.2%40.5%56.0%
P72
Rev/Bed$1.8M$506K$827K$1.4M
P89
Exp/Bed$1.4M$627K$872K$1.3M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML