Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PUTNAM GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PUTNAM GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 111313 | GA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.3M → Pro Forma $-3.3M (+$914K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$914K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$666K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$914K
Modeled Uplift
$597K
Risk-Adjusted
-$317K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$347K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$344K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$211K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$914K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$347K$347K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$334K$10K$344K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$158K$211K$666K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$87K$174K$261K$347K$347K$347K$347K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$86K$172K$258K$344K$344K$344K$344K
A/R Days Reduction$0$70K$141K$211K$211K$211K$211K$211K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$249K$498K$741K$914K$914K$914K$914K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $914K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.3M$-4.3M-24.5%
Year 1$-4.4M+$609K$-3.8M-21.8%
Year 2$-4.5M+$914K$-3.6M-20.8%
Year 3$-4.7M+$914K$-3.7M-21.5%
Year 4$-4.8M+$914K$-3.9M-22.3%
Year 5$-4.9M+$914K$-4.0M-23.2%
$-42.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-44.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.7M
Value Created
$-4.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.8M
Organic Growth
$9.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-4.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$174K$261K$347K$417K
Denial Rate Reductio$172K$258K$344K$413K
A/R Days Reduction$106K$159K$211K$254K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$8K$11K$13K
Total$457K$685K$914K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-24.5%-20.1%-3.8%5.5%
P18
Net-to-Gross32.0%28.7%36.6%50.7%
P34
Occupancy42.4%21.3%40.5%55.1%
P59
Rev/Bed$695K$489K$717K$1.3M
P46
Exp/Bed$865K$580K$776K$1.2M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML