Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH NAVICENT PEACH 2026-04-26 19:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ATRIUM HEALTH NAVICENT PEACH
CCN 111310 | GA | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-197K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-197K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$421K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$574K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$568K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$349K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$574K$574K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$552K$16K$568K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$88K$261K$349K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$143K$287K$430K$574K$574K$574K$574K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$142K$284K$426K$568K$568K$568K$568K
A/R Days Reduction$0$116K$233K$349K$349K$349K$349K$349K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$411K$822K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-1.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
7.8x
Headroom (turns)
120%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 120% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -1.3x, adding 100.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-197K$-197K-0.7%
Year 1$-203K+$1.0M$804K2.8%
Year 2$-209K+$1.5M$1.3M4.5%
Year 3$-215K+$1.5M$1.3M4.5%
Year 4$-222K+$1.5M$1.3M4.5%
Year 5$-228K+$1.5M$1.3M4.5%
$-2.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.1M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$-314K
Organic Growth
$15.1M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$287K$430K$574K$689K
Denial Rate Reductio$284K$426K$568K$682K
A/R Days Reduction$175K$262K$349K$419K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$755K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.7%-20.1%-3.8%5.5%
P57
Net-to-Gross35.3%28.7%36.6%50.7%
P46
Occupancy73.8%21.3%40.5%55.1%
P90
Rev/Bed$1.1M$489K$717K$1.3M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.2M$580K$776K$1.2M
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML