Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL INC. 2026-04-26 12:29 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT MOUNTAINSIDE HOSPITAL INC.
CCN 110225 | GA | 52 beds | Current EBITDA $13.8M → Pro Forma $20.7M (+$6.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$131.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$20.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

77%
Realization (B)
$6.9M
Modeled Uplift
$5.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 77% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.3M (vs $6.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$84K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.6M$2.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.5M$72K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$403K$1.2M$1.6M$5.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$84K$84K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$656K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$649K$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$532K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$42K$84K$84K$84K$84K$84K$84K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.6M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M$6.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 12.9x
9.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x
12.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.8M$13.8M10.5%
Year 1$14.2M+$4.6M$18.8M14.3%
Year 2$14.6M+$6.9M$21.5M16.4%
Year 3$15.1M+$6.9M$22.0M16.7%
Year 4$15.5M+$6.9M$22.4M17.1%
Year 5$16.0M+$6.9M$22.9M17.4%
$137.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$251.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$113.8M
Value Created
$22.9M
Exit EBITDA
$21.9M
Organic Growth
$69.0M
RCM Value Creation
$22.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$798K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$42K$63K$84K$101K
Total$3.5M$5.2M$6.9M$8.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 63 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.5%-16.4%-3.4%6.0%
P80
Net-to-Gross18.8%18.9%30.4%37.9%
P23
Occupancy86.9%25.7%51.4%74.5%
P92
Rev/Bed$2.5M$489K$680K$1.4M
P92
Exp/Bed$2.3M$502K$764K$1.5M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML