Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT FAYETTE HOSPITAL INC. 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT FAYETTE HOSPITAL INC.
CCN 110215 | GA | 294 beds | Current EBITDA $68.2M → Pro Forma $95.4M (+$27.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$516.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$68.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$95.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$19.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$27.1M
Modeled Uplift
$20.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.2M (vs $27.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$330K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.3M$10.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.9M$284K$10.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.7M$6.3M$19.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$330K$330K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.7M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M$10.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.1M$7.7M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M$10.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.2M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M$6.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$165K$330K$330K$330K$330K$330K$330K
Cumulative$0$7.4M$14.8M$22.0M$27.1M$27.1M$27.1M$27.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x57% / 9.4x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$68.2M$68.2M13.2%
Year 1$70.3M+$18.1M$88.4M17.1%
Year 2$72.4M+$27.1M$99.5M19.3%
Year 3$74.6M+$27.1M$101.7M19.7%
Year 4$76.8M+$27.1M$103.9M20.1%
Year 5$79.1M+$27.1M$106.2M20.6%
$682.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.17B
Exit EV (11x)
$486.3M
Value Created
$106.2M
Exit EBITDA
$108.7M
Organic Growth
$271.4M
RCM Value Creation
$106.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.2M$7.7M$10.3M$12.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.1M$7.7M$10.2M$12.3M
A/R Days Reduction$3.1M$4.7M$6.3M$7.5M
Clean Claim Rate$165K$248K$330K$396K
Total$13.6M$20.4M$27.1M$32.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.2%-14.4%-2.5%5.5%
P82
Net-to-Gross18.5%18.5%21.9%27.5%
P25
Occupancy89.1%65.2%76.3%80.3%
P89
Rev/Bed$1.8M$1.0M$1.6M$1.8M
P68
Exp/Bed$1.5M$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML