Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TURNING POINT HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:25 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TURNING POINT HOSPITAL
CCN 110209 | GA | 53 beds | Current EBITDA $6.0M → Pro Forma $7.6M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$517K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$603K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$597K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$367K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$603K$603K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$580K$17K$597K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$92K$274K$367K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$151K$301K$452K$603K$603K$603K$603K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$149K$298K$448K$597K$597K$597K$597K
A/R Days Reduction$0$122K$244K$367K$367K$367K$367K$367K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$432K$864K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.0M$6.0M19.9%
Year 1$6.2M+$1.1M$7.2M24.0%
Year 2$6.4M+$1.6M$7.9M26.3%
Year 3$6.5M+$1.6M$8.1M27.0%
Year 4$6.7M+$1.6M$8.3M27.6%
Year 5$6.9M+$1.6M$8.5M28.3%
$59.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$93.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$33.9M
Value Created
$8.5M
Exit EBITDA
$9.5M
Organic Growth
$15.9M
RCM Value Creation
$8.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$301K$452K$603K$723K
Denial Rate Reductio$298K$448K$597K$716K
A/R Days Reduction$183K$275K$367K$440K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$793K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 62 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.9%-16.5%-3.3%6.1%
P87
Net-to-Gross31.2%18.9%30.6%38.0%
P52
Occupancy46.0%25.3%52.2%74.5%
P45
Rev/Bed$569K$487K$648K$1.4M
P42
Exp/Bed$456K$491K$764K$1.5M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML