Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT EASTSIDE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT EASTSIDE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110192 | GA | 206 beds | Current EBITDA $-33.1M → Pro Forma $-20.8M (+$12.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$233.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-33.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-20.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$9.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$12.3M
Modeled Uplift
$8.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.8M (vs $12.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$150K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.7M$4.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.5M$128K$4.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$717K$2.1M$2.8M$9.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$150K$150K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$948K$1.9M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$75K$150K$150K$150K$150K$150K$150K
Cumulative$0$3.3M$6.7M$10.0M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-33.1M$-33.1M-14.2%
Year 1$-34.1M+$8.2M$-25.9M-11.1%
Year 2$-35.1M+$12.3M$-22.8M-9.8%
Year 3$-36.1M+$12.3M$-23.9M-10.2%
Year 4$-37.2M+$12.3M$-24.9M-10.7%
Year 5$-38.3M+$12.3M$-26.1M-11.2%
$-330.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-286.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$44.2M
Value Created
$-26.1M
Exit EBITDA
$-52.7M
Organic Growth
$122.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-26.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.6M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$75K$112K$150K$179K
Total$6.1M$9.2M$12.3M$14.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 52 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.2%-10.9%-0.9%9.0%
P18
Net-to-Gross13.0%18.1%21.6%29.3%
P8
Occupancy76.6%66.1%76.6%86.2%
P48
Rev/Bed$1.1M$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M
P36
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML