Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF AUGUSTA 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DOCTORS HOSPITAL OF AUGUSTA
CCN 110177 | GA | 291 beds | Current EBITDA $142.5M → Pro Forma $167.3M (+$24.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$471.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$142.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$167.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$24.8M
Modeled Uplift
$17.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $17.8M (vs $24.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$302K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.4M$9.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.1M$259K$9.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.3M$5.7M$18.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$302K$302K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.7M$7.1M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M$9.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$151K$302K$302K$302K$302K$302K$302K
Cumulative$0$6.8M$13.5M$20.1M$24.8M$24.8M$24.8M$24.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.2x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$142.5M$142.5M30.2%
Year 1$146.8M+$16.5M$163.3M34.6%
Year 2$151.2M+$24.8M$176.0M37.3%
Year 3$155.8M+$24.8M$180.6M38.3%
Year 4$160.4M+$24.8M$185.2M39.3%
Year 5$165.2M+$24.8M$190.0M40.3%
$1.43B
Entry EV (10x)
$2.09B
Exit EV (11x)
$665.1M
Value Created
$190.0M
Exit EBITDA
$227.0M
Organic Growth
$248.0M
RCM Value Creation
$190.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.7M$7.1M$9.4M$11.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.3M$5.7M$6.9M
Clean Claim Rate$151K$226K$302K$362K
Total$12.4M$18.6M$24.8M$29.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin30.2%-14.4%-2.5%5.5%
P93
Net-to-Gross11.5%18.5%21.9%27.5%
P2
Occupancy76.7%65.2%76.3%80.3%
P55
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.0M$1.6M$1.8M
P61
Exp/Bed$1.1M$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML