Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PERRY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PERRY HOSPITAL
CCN 110153 | GA | 39 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.3M → Pro Forma $468K (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$33.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$468K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$600K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$660K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$654K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$402K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$660K$660K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$636K$18K$654K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$101K$300K$402K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT48.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$165K$330K$495K$660K$660K$660K$660K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$163K$327K$490K$654K$654K$654K$654K
A/R Days Reduction$0$134K$268K$402K$402K$402K$402K$402K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$473K$946K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-22.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
29.4x
Headroom (turns)
453%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 453% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -22.9x, adding 121.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.3M$-1.3M-3.8%
Year 1$-1.3M+$1.2M$-149K-0.5%
Year 2$-1.3M+$1.7M$391K1.2%
Year 3$-1.4M+$1.7M$351K1.1%
Year 4$-1.4M+$1.7M$309K0.9%
Year 5$-1.5M+$1.7M$266K0.8%
$-12.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$2.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$15.6M
Value Created
$266K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.0M
Organic Growth
$17.4M
RCM Value Creation
$266K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$330K$495K$660K$792K
Denial Rate Reductio$327K$490K$654K$784K
A/R Days Reduction$201K$301K$402K$482K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$21K$25K
Total$868K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 83 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.8%-17.7%-3.3%7.8%
P46
Net-to-Gross23.0%25.1%34.7%48.1%
P21
Occupancy40.7%26.6%42.9%67.3%
P45
Rev/Bed$847K$489K$717K$1.4M
P58
Exp/Bed$879K$530K$776K$1.4M
P57

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML