Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — COBB HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — COBB HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110143 | GA | 367 beds | Current EBITDA $54.6M → Pro Forma $101.8M (+$47.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$897.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$54.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$47.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$101.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$34.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$47.2M
Modeled Uplift
$34.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $34.3M (vs $47.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$17.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$17.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$10.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$574K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$47.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$17.9M$17.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$17.3M$493K$17.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.8M$8.2M$10.9M$34.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$574K$574K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$4.5M$9.0M$13.5M$17.9M$17.9M$17.9M$17.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$4.4M$8.9M$13.3M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M$17.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.6M$7.3M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$287K$574K$574K$574K$574K$574K$574K
Cumulative$0$12.9M$25.7M$38.3M$47.2M$47.2M$47.2M$47.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $47.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.8x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x
9.0x58% / 9.9x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x
10.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.5x
11.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
12.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.0x
Headroom (turns)
30%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 30% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.5x, adding 3.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$54.6M$54.6M6.1%
Year 1$56.2M+$31.5M$87.7M9.8%
Year 2$57.9M+$47.2M$105.1M11.7%
Year 3$59.6M+$47.2M$106.8M11.9%
Year 4$61.4M+$47.2M$108.6M12.1%
Year 5$63.3M+$47.2M$110.5M12.3%
$545.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.22B
Exit EV (11x)
$669.3M
Value Created
$110.5M
Exit EBITDA
$86.9M
Organic Growth
$471.9M
RCM Value Creation
$110.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$9.0M$13.5M$17.9M$21.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$8.9M$13.3M$17.8M$21.3M
A/R Days Reduction$5.5M$8.2M$10.9M$13.1M
Clean Claim Rate$287K$431K$574K$689K
Total$23.6M$35.4M$47.2M$56.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 44 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.1%-15.2%-2.5%5.3%
P77
Net-to-Gross18.3%19.0%22.2%27.5%
P18
Occupancy79.8%66.0%76.7%83.3%
P64
Rev/Bed$2.4M$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M
P84
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.2M$1.6M$2.1M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML