Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EVANS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EVANS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 110142 | GA | 49 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.4M → Pro Forma $-1.5M (+$835K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$15.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$835K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$609K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$835K
Modeled Uplift
$486K
Risk-Adjusted
-$348K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$317K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$314K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$193K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$835K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$317K$317K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$305K$9K$314K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$49K$144K$193K$609K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$79K$159K$238K$317K$317K$317K$317K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$79K$157K$236K$314K$314K$314K$314K
A/R Days Reduction$0$64K$129K$193K$193K$193K$193K$193K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$227K$455K$677K$835K$835K$835K$835K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $835K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.4M$-2.4M-14.9%
Year 1$-2.4M+$556K$-1.9M-11.8%
Year 2$-2.5M+$835K$-1.7M-10.5%
Year 3$-2.6M+$835K$-1.7M-11.0%
Year 4$-2.7M+$835K$-1.8M-11.5%
Year 5$-2.7M+$835K$-1.9M-12.0%
$-23.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-20.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$2.7M
Value Created
$-1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.8M
Organic Growth
$8.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$159K$238K$317K$381K
Denial Rate Reductio$157K$236K$314K$377K
A/R Days Reduction$97K$145K$193K$232K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$417K$626K$835K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-14.9%-15.8%-3.3%5.8%
P26
Net-to-Gross16.5%23.0%32.4%40.9%
P9
Occupancy9.9%27.3%44.4%68.3%
P4
Rev/Bed$324K$513K$736K$1.4M
P6
Exp/Bed$372K$577K$826K$1.5M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML