Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH GEORGIA MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110122 | GA | 224 beds | Current EBITDA $-58.2M → Pro Forma $-39.2M (+$18.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$359.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-58.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-39.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$18.9M
Modeled Uplift
$14.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.0M (vs $18.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$230K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.2M$7.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.9M$198K$7.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.3M$4.4M$13.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$230K$230K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$2.9M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$115K$230K$230K$230K$230K$230K$230K
Cumulative$0$5.2M$10.3M$15.4M$18.9M$18.9M$18.9M$18.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-58.2M$-58.2M-16.2%
Year 1$-59.9M+$12.6M$-47.3M-13.1%
Year 2$-61.7M+$18.9M$-42.8M-11.9%
Year 3$-63.6M+$18.9M$-44.6M-12.4%
Year 4$-65.5M+$18.9M$-46.5M-12.9%
Year 5$-67.4M+$18.9M$-48.5M-13.5%
$-581.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-533.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$48.2M
Value Created
$-48.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-92.7M
Organic Growth
$189.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-48.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.6M$5.4M$7.2M$8.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.6M$5.3M$7.1M$8.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.2M$3.3M$4.4M$5.3M
Clean Claim Rate$115K$173K$230K$276K
Total$9.5M$14.2M$18.9M$22.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 50 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-16.2%-11.2%-1.0%10.0%
P12
Net-to-Gross27.2%18.0%21.5%27.5%
P67
Occupancy85.8%65.9%76.6%86.9%
P72
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.0M$1.6M$1.8M
P58
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.0M$1.5M$1.8M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML