Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GRADY GENERAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GRADY GENERAL HOSPITAL
CCN 110121 | GA | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $3.4M → Pro Forma $5.1M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$31.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$647K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$631K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$625K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$384K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$20K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$631K$631K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$608K$17K$625K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$97K$287K$384K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$20K$20K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$158K$316K$473K$631K$631K$631K$631K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$156K$312K$469K$625K$625K$625K$625K
A/R Days Reduction$0$128K$256K$384K$384K$384K$384K$384K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K$20K
Cumulative$0$452K$904K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.8x
9.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
10.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
11.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x
12.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.8x
Headroom (turns)
13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.7x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.4M$3.4M10.7%
Year 1$3.5M+$1.1M$4.6M14.6%
Year 2$3.6M+$1.7M$5.3M16.7%
Year 3$3.7M+$1.7M$5.4M17.0%
Year 4$3.8M+$1.7M$5.5M17.4%
Year 5$3.9M+$1.7M$5.6M17.7%
$33.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$61.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.6M
Value Created
$5.6M
Exit EBITDA
$5.4M
Organic Growth
$16.6M
RCM Value Creation
$5.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$316K$473K$631K$757K
Denial Rate Reductio$312K$469K$625K$750K
A/R Days Reduction$192K$288K$384K$461K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$15K$20K$24K
Total$830K$1.2M$1.7M$2.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 91 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.7%-16.4%-3.4%6.0%
P81
Net-to-Gross39.2%23.3%32.6%47.0%
P67
Occupancy24.9%26.6%42.9%65.6%
P23
Rev/Bed$717K$505K$728K$1.4M
P48
Exp/Bed$640K$546K$791K$1.4M
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML