Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AHN THE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AHN THE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110107 | GA | 632 beds | Current EBITDA $-633K → Pro Forma $39.7M (+$40.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$767.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-633K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$40.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$39.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$29.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$40.4M
Modeled Uplift
$27.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.5M (vs $40.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$491K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$40.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.3M$15.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$14.8M$422K$15.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.0M$9.3M$29.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$491K$491K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.8M$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M$15.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.8M$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M$15.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$246K$491K$491K$491K$491K$491K$491K
Cumulative$0$11.0M$22.0M$32.7M$40.4M$40.4M$40.4M$40.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $40.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.6x
Headroom (turns)
102%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 102% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.1x, adding 99.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-633K$-633K-0.1%
Year 1$-652K+$26.9M$26.3M3.4%
Year 2$-672K+$40.4M$39.7M5.2%
Year 3$-692K+$40.4M$39.7M5.2%
Year 4$-713K+$40.4M$39.7M5.2%
Year 5$-734K+$40.4M$39.6M5.2%
$-6.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$435.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$442.3M
Value Created
$39.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.0M
Organic Growth
$403.6M
RCM Value Creation
$39.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.7M$11.5M$15.3M$18.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.6M$11.4M$15.2M$18.2M
A/R Days Reduction$4.7M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M
Clean Claim Rate$246K$368K$491K$589K
Total$20.2M$30.3M$40.4M$48.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 22 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.1%-8.4%-1.8%4.3%
P59
Net-to-Gross22.4%20.6%22.2%30.0%
P50
Occupancy78.6%73.7%79.9%86.4%
P41
Rev/Bed$1.2M$1.3M$1.9M$2.4M
P18
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.3M$1.9M$2.3M
P14

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML