Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPHS OF ATLANTA 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPHS OF ATLANTA
CCN 110082 | GA | 344 beds | Current EBITDA $14.0M → Pro Forma $43.1M (+$29.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$552.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$14.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$29.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$43.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$21.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$29.1M
Modeled Uplift
$20.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $20.6M (vs $29.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$11.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$354K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$29.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$11.0M$11.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.6M$304K$10.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.7M$5.0M$6.7M$21.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$354K$354K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.8M$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M$11.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.5M$8.2M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M$10.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.5M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M$6.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$177K$354K$354K$354K$354K$354K$354K
Cumulative$0$7.9M$15.8M$23.6M$29.1M$29.1M$29.1M$29.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $29.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x83% / 20.4x87% / 23.0x91% / 25.6x93% / 27.0x95% / 28.3x
9.0x78% / 17.8x82% / 20.1x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.8x
10.0x73% / 15.7x78% / 17.8x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x86% / 22.0x
11.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.7x
12.0x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.3x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.7x
Headroom (turns)
58%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 58% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.8x, adding 5.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$14.0M$14.0M2.5%
Year 1$14.4M+$19.4M$33.8M6.1%
Year 2$14.9M+$29.1M$43.9M8.0%
Year 3$15.3M+$29.1M$44.4M8.0%
Year 4$15.8M+$29.1M$44.8M8.1%
Year 5$16.2M+$29.1M$45.3M8.2%
$140.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$498.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$358.3M
Value Created
$45.3M
Exit EBITDA
$22.3M
Organic Growth
$290.7M
RCM Value Creation
$45.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.5M$8.3M$11.0M$13.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.5M$8.2M$10.9M$13.1M
A/R Days Reduction$3.4M$5.0M$6.7M$8.1M
Clean Claim Rate$177K$265K$354K$424K
Total$14.5M$21.8M$29.1M$34.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.5%-14.2%-1.0%6.1%
P62
Net-to-Gross27.5%19.2%22.1%27.5%
P73
Occupancy77.0%66.2%76.7%83.2%
P51
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M
P51
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
P47

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML