Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 02:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 110079 | GA | 694 beds | Current EBITDA $-469.0M → Pro Forma $-406.6M (+$62.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.19B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-469.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$62.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-406.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$45.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$62.4M
Modeled Uplift
$44.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$17.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $44.7M (vs $62.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$23.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$23.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$14.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$759K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$62.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$23.7M$23.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$22.8M$652K$23.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.6M$10.8M$14.4M$45.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$759K$759K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.9M$11.9M$17.8M$23.7M$23.7M$23.7M$23.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.9M$11.7M$17.6M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M$23.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.8M$9.6M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M$14.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$379K$759K$759K$759K$759K$759K$759K
Cumulative$0$17.0M$34.0M$50.6M$62.4M$62.4M$62.4M$62.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $62.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-469.0M$-469.0M-39.6%
Year 1$-483.1M+$41.6M$-441.5M-37.2%
Year 2$-497.6M+$62.4M$-435.2M-36.7%
Year 3$-512.5M+$62.4M$-450.1M-38.0%
Year 4$-527.9M+$62.4M$-465.5M-39.3%
Year 5$-543.7M+$62.4M$-481.4M-40.6%
$-4.69B
Entry EV (10x)
$-5.29B
Exit EV (11x)
$-604.5M
Value Created
$-481.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-747.1M
Organic Growth
$623.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-481.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$11.9M$17.8M$23.7M$28.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$11.7M$17.6M$23.5M$28.2M
A/R Days Reduction$7.2M$10.8M$14.4M$17.3M
Clean Claim Rate$379K$569K$759K$911K
Total$31.2M$46.8M$62.4M$74.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-39.6%-13.5%-2.5%3.0%
P0
Net-to-Gross16.2%20.1%21.6%25.1%
P0
Occupancy93.4%75.3%80.1%88.1%
P83
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P44
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.2M$2.0M$2.3M
P78

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML