Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MIDTOWN 2026-04-26 09:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL MIDTOWN
CCN 110078 | GA | 548 beds | Current EBITDA $-210.5M → Pro Forma $-138.4M (+$72.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.37B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-210.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$72.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-138.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$52.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$72.1M
Modeled Uplift
$51.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$20.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $51.5M (vs $72.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$27.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$27.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$16.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$877K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$72.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$27.4M$27.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$26.4M$753K$27.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.2M$12.5M$16.7M$52.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$877K$877K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$6.8M$13.7M$20.5M$27.4M$27.4M$27.4M$27.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.8M$13.6M$20.3M$27.1M$27.1M$27.1M$27.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.6M$11.1M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M$16.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$438K$877K$877K$877K$877K$877K$877K
Cumulative$0$19.6M$39.2M$58.4M$72.1M$72.1M$72.1M$72.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $72.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-210.5M$-210.5M-15.4%
Year 1$-216.8M+$48.0M$-168.8M-12.3%
Year 2$-223.3M+$72.1M$-151.2M-11.0%
Year 3$-230.0M+$72.1M$-157.9M-11.5%
Year 4$-236.9M+$72.1M$-164.8M-12.0%
Year 5$-244.0M+$72.1M$-171.9M-12.6%
$-2.10B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.89B
Exit EV (11x)
$213.4M
Value Created
$-171.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-335.2M
Organic Growth
$720.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-171.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$13.7M$20.5M$27.4M$32.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.6M$20.3M$27.1M$32.5M
A/R Days Reduction$8.3M$12.5M$16.7M$20.0M
Clean Claim Rate$438K$657K$877K$1.1M
Total$36.0M$54.0M$72.1M$86.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.4%-8.1%-1.0%5.6%
P14
Net-to-Gross32.5%19.0%21.6%28.3%
P86
Occupancy83.2%69.8%79.0%84.5%
P64
Rev/Bed$2.5M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P82
Exp/Bed$2.9M$1.2M$1.6M$2.2M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML