Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EAST GEORGIA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EAST GEORGIA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110075 | GA | 142 beds | Current EBITDA $36.9M → Pro Forma $46.5M (+$9.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$184.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$36.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$9.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$46.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$9.7M
Modeled Uplift
$7.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.0M (vs $9.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$3.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$3.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$118K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$9.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$3.7M$3.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.5M$101K$3.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$565K$1.7M$2.2M$7.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$118K$118K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$920K$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$911K$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$746K$1.5M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$59K$118K$118K$118K$118K$118K$118K
Cumulative$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.8M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M$9.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $9.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x55% / 9.1x
10.0x38% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$36.9M$36.9M20.0%
Year 1$38.0M+$6.5M$44.4M24.1%
Year 2$39.1M+$9.7M$48.8M26.5%
Year 3$40.3M+$9.7M$49.9M27.1%
Year 4$41.5M+$9.7M$51.2M27.8%
Year 5$42.7M+$9.7M$52.4M28.5%
$368.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$576.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$207.9M
Value Created
$52.4M
Exit EBITDA
$58.7M
Organic Growth
$96.8M
RCM Value Creation
$52.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.8M$2.8M$3.7M$4.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M
A/R Days Reduction$1.1M$1.7M$2.2M$2.7M
Clean Claim Rate$59K$88K$118K$141K
Total$4.8M$7.3M$9.7M$11.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 54 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.0%-12.8%-0.9%6.9%
P90
Net-to-Gross16.5%16.7%23.3%29.4%
P23
Occupancy73.8%60.5%74.6%80.8%
P43
Rev/Bed$1.3M$565K$1.3M$1.7M
P52
Exp/Bed$1.0M$681K$1.3M$1.8M
P37

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML