Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FLOYD MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 02:16 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FLOYD MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110054 | GA | 227 beds | Current EBITDA $66.9M → Pro Forma $92.3M (+$25.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$481.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$66.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$25.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$92.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$18.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$25.3M
Modeled Uplift
$19.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.8M (vs $25.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$308K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$25.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.6M$9.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$9.3M$265K$9.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.5M$4.4M$5.9M$18.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$308K$308K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.4M$4.8M$7.2M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M$9.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.0M$3.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$154K$308K$308K$308K$308K$308K$308K
Cumulative$0$6.9M$13.8M$20.5M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M$25.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $25.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x
9.0x46% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$66.9M$66.9M13.9%
Year 1$68.9M+$16.9M$85.8M17.8%
Year 2$71.0M+$25.3M$96.4M20.0%
Year 3$73.1M+$25.3M$98.5M20.4%
Year 4$75.3M+$25.3M$100.7M20.9%
Year 5$77.6M+$25.3M$102.9M21.4%
$669.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.13B
Exit EV (11x)
$463.0M
Value Created
$102.9M
Exit EBITDA
$106.6M
Organic Growth
$253.4M
RCM Value Creation
$102.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.8M$7.2M$9.5M$11.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.9M$4.4M$5.9M$7.0M
Clean Claim Rate$154K$231K$308K$370K
Total$12.7M$19.0M$25.3M$30.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.9%-12.4%-1.8%8.3%
P80
Net-to-Gross23.9%18.3%21.6%27.5%
P57
Occupancy103.9%65.9%76.0%80.8%
P93
Rev/Bed$2.1M$1.0M$1.6M$1.8M
P86
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML