Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT WALTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:28 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PIEDMONT WALTON HOSPITAL
CCN 110046 | GA | 76 beds | Current EBITDA $37.4M → Pro Forma $44.2M (+$6.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$128.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$44.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$6.8M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $6.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$82K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.6M$2.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.5M$71K$2.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$395K$1.2M$1.6M$4.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$82K$82K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$643K$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$637K$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$522K$1.0M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$41K$82K$82K$82K$82K$82K$82K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M$6.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x39% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.4M$37.4M29.1%
Year 1$38.5M+$4.5M$43.0M33.5%
Year 2$39.7M+$6.8M$46.5M36.1%
Year 3$40.9M+$6.8M$47.6M37.0%
Year 4$42.1M+$6.8M$48.9M38.0%
Year 5$43.4M+$6.8M$50.1M39.0%
$374.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$551.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$177.4M
Value Created
$50.1M
Exit EBITDA
$59.6M
Organic Growth
$67.7M
RCM Value Creation
$50.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M$3.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.1M
A/R Days Reduction$783K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M
Clean Claim Rate$41K$62K$82K$99K
Total$3.4M$5.1M$6.8M$8.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin29.1%-12.2%-0.8%8.8%
P94
Net-to-Gross18.9%18.3%28.5%36.3%
P30
Occupancy61.1%38.5%67.7%80.3%
P44
Rev/Bed$1.7M$493K$732K$1.6M
P77
Exp/Bed$1.2M$462K$863K$1.5M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML