Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL INC. 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. JOSEPHS HOSPITAL INC.
CCN 110043 | GA | 188 beds | Current EBITDA $-46.9M → Pro Forma $-31.1M (+$15.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$300.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-46.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-31.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$15.8M
Modeled Uplift
$11.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.5M (vs $15.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$192K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$165K$6.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$922K$2.7M$3.7M$11.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$192K$192K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$96K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-46.9M$-46.9M-15.6%
Year 1$-48.3M+$10.5M$-37.8M-12.6%
Year 2$-49.8M+$15.8M$-34.0M-11.3%
Year 3$-51.3M+$15.8M$-35.4M-11.8%
Year 4$-52.8M+$15.8M$-37.0M-12.3%
Year 5$-54.4M+$15.8M$-38.6M-12.8%
$-469.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-424.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$44.8M
Value Created
$-38.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-74.7M
Organic Growth
$158.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-38.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$96K$144K$192K$231K
Total$7.9M$11.9M$15.8M$19.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 51 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-15.6%-11.2%1.4%10.0%
P17
Net-to-Gross21.3%18.0%23.5%30.8%
P43
Occupancy76.7%67.0%76.7%86.5%
P49
Rev/Bed$1.6M$956K$1.5M$1.8M
P59
Exp/Bed$1.8M$981K$1.4M$1.8M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML