Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HEALTH UNIV MED CENTER 2026-04-26 06:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MEMORIAL HEALTH UNIV MED CENTER
CCN 110036 | GA | 564 beds | Current EBITDA $-7.4M → Pro Forma $29.9M (+$37.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$708.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-7.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$37.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$29.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$27.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$37.3M
Modeled Uplift
$27.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$10.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.0M (vs $37.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$14.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$14.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$453K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$37.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$14.2M$14.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.6M$390K$14.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.2M$6.4M$8.6M$27.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$453K$453K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.5M$7.1M$10.6M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M$14.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.5M$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M$14.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.9M$5.7M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M$8.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$227K$453K$453K$453K$453K$453K$453K
Cumulative$0$10.1M$20.3M$30.2M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M$37.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $37.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.6x
Headroom (turns)
132%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 132% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.1x, adding 101.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-7.4M$-7.4M-1.0%
Year 1$-7.6M+$24.8M$17.3M2.4%
Year 2$-7.8M+$37.3M$29.5M4.2%
Year 3$-8.0M+$37.3M$29.2M4.1%
Year 4$-8.3M+$37.3M$29.0M4.1%
Year 5$-8.5M+$37.3M$28.7M4.1%
$-73.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$316.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$389.7M
Value Created
$28.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-11.7M
Organic Growth
$372.7M
RCM Value Creation
$28.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.1M$10.6M$14.2M$17.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.0M$10.5M$14.0M$16.8M
A/R Days Reduction$4.3M$6.5M$8.6M$10.3M
Clean Claim Rate$227K$340K$453K$544K
Total$18.6M$28.0M$37.3M$44.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.0%-8.2%-1.0%5.8%
P52
Net-to-Gross17.2%19.6%21.7%29.1%
P7
Occupancy95.3%72.0%79.5%85.4%
P93
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.7M$2.4M
P26
Exp/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.7M$2.2M
P30

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML