Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KENNESTONE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:22 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KENNESTONE HOSPITAL
CCN 110035 | GA | 642 beds | Current EBITDA $230.0M → Pro Forma $308.9M (+$78.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.50B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$230.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$78.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$308.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$57.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$78.9M
Modeled Uplift
$56.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$22.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $56.8M (vs $78.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$30.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$29.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$18.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$960K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$78.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$30.0M$30.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$28.9M$825K$29.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.6M$13.6M$18.2M$57.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$960K$960K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$7.5M$15.0M$22.5M$30.0M$30.0M$30.0M$30.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$7.4M$14.8M$22.3M$29.7M$29.7M$29.7M$29.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$6.1M$12.2M$18.2M$18.2M$18.2M$18.2M$18.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$480K$960K$960K$960K$960K$960K$960K
Cumulative$0$21.5M$43.0M$64.0M$78.9M$78.9M$78.9M$78.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $78.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$230.0M$230.0M15.3%
Year 1$236.9M+$52.6M$289.5M19.3%
Year 2$244.0M+$78.9M$322.9M21.5%
Year 3$251.3M+$78.9M$330.2M22.0%
Year 4$258.8M+$78.9M$337.7M22.5%
Year 5$266.6M+$78.9M$345.5M23.0%
$2.30B
Entry EV (10x)
$3.80B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.50B
Value Created
$345.5M
Exit EBITDA
$366.3M
Organic Growth
$788.9M
RCM Value Creation
$345.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$15.0M$22.5M$30.0M$36.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$14.8M$22.3M$29.7M$35.6M
A/R Days Reduction$9.1M$13.7M$18.2M$21.9M
Clean Claim Rate$480K$720K$960K$1.2M
Total$39.4M$59.2M$78.9M$94.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.3%-8.5%-2.5%4.0%
P90
Net-to-Gross20.5%20.5%22.1%27.5%
P24
Occupancy89.6%74.6%79.9%87.3%
P76
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.3M$1.8M$2.4M
P67
Exp/Bed$2.0M$1.3M$2.0M$2.3M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML