Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AU MEDICAL CENTER INC 2026-04-26 05:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AU MEDICAL CENTER INC
CCN 110034 | GA | 494 beds | Current EBITDA $-282.1M → Pro Forma $-240.6M (+$41.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$789.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-282.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$41.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-240.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$30.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$41.5M
Modeled Uplift
$29.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$12.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $29.2M (vs $41.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$15.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$15.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$9.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$505K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$41.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$15.8M$15.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$15.2M$434K$15.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.4M$7.2M$9.6M$30.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$505K$505K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.9M$7.9M$11.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.9M$7.8M$11.7M$15.6M$15.6M$15.6M$15.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$3.2M$6.4M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M$9.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$253K$505K$505K$505K$505K$505K$505K
Cumulative$0$11.3M$22.6M$33.7M$41.5M$41.5M$41.5M$41.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $41.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-282.1M$-282.1M-35.7%
Year 1$-290.6M+$27.7M$-262.9M-33.3%
Year 2$-299.3M+$41.5M$-257.8M-32.7%
Year 3$-308.3M+$41.5M$-266.8M-33.8%
Year 4$-317.6M+$41.5M$-276.0M-35.0%
Year 5$-327.1M+$41.5M$-285.6M-36.2%
$-2.82B
Entry EV (10x)
$-3.14B
Exit EV (11x)
$-319.7M
Value Created
$-285.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-449.4M
Organic Growth
$415.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-285.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$7.9M$11.8M$15.8M$18.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$7.8M$11.7M$15.6M$18.8M
A/R Days Reduction$4.8M$7.2M$9.6M$11.5M
Clean Claim Rate$253K$379K$505K$606K
Total$20.8M$31.1M$41.5M$49.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 29 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-35.7%-8.5%-1.0%5.4%
P3
Net-to-Gross20.0%19.2%21.7%27.5%
P28
Occupancy79.9%67.2%78.6%83.5%
P59
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M
P34
Exp/Bed$2.2M$1.2M$1.7M$2.2M
P72

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML