Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS SACRED HEART HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS SACRED HEART HOSPITAL
CCN 110027 | GA | 56 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.6M → Pro Forma $-2.6M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$729K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$761K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$754K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$463K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$761K$761K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$733K$21K$754K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$117K$346K$463K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$190K$381K$571K$761K$761K$761K$761K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$188K$377K$565K$754K$754K$754K$754K
A/R Days Reduction$0$154K$309K$463K$463K$463K$463K$463K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$545K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.6M$-4.6M-12.2%
Year 1$-4.8M+$1.3M$-3.4M-9.1%
Year 2$-4.9M+$2.0M$-2.9M-7.7%
Year 3$-5.1M+$2.0M$-3.1M-8.1%
Year 4$-5.2M+$2.0M$-3.2M-8.5%
Year 5$-5.4M+$2.0M$-3.4M-8.9%
$-46.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-37.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.2M
Value Created
$-3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-7.4M
Organic Growth
$20.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$381K$571K$761K$913K
Denial Rate Reductio$377K$565K$754K$904K
A/R Days Reduction$232K$347K$463K$556K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 67 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-12.2%-15.8%-1.6%6.7%
P32
Net-to-Gross31.3%18.8%30.6%38.0%
P53
Occupancy37.1%27.5%53.7%77.3%
P33
Rev/Bed$680K$479K$648K$1.4M
P50
Exp/Bed$762K$488K$764K$1.5M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML