Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CANDLER HOSPITAL INC 2026-04-26 03:58 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CANDLER HOSPITAL INC
CCN 110024 | GA | 263 beds | Current EBITDA $-60.3M → Pro Forma $-37.1M (+$23.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$440.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-60.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$23.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-37.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$16.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$23.2M
Modeled Uplift
$16.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $16.1M (vs $23.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$282K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$23.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.8M$8.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.5M$242K$8.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.0M$5.4M$16.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$282K$282K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M$8.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.2M$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M$8.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.8M$3.6M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$141K$282K$282K$282K$282K$282K$282K
Cumulative$0$6.3M$12.6M$18.8M$23.2M$23.2M$23.2M$23.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $23.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-60.3M$-60.3M-13.7%
Year 1$-62.1M+$15.5M$-46.7M-10.6%
Year 2$-64.0M+$23.2M$-40.8M-9.3%
Year 3$-65.9M+$23.2M$-42.7M-9.7%
Year 4$-67.9M+$23.2M$-44.7M-10.1%
Year 5$-69.9M+$23.2M$-46.7M-10.6%
$-603.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$-514.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$89.1M
Value Created
$-46.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-96.1M
Organic Growth
$231.9M
RCM Value Creation
$-46.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.4M$6.6M$8.8M$10.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.4M$6.5M$8.7M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$2.7M$4.0M$5.4M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$141K$212K$282K$339K
Total$11.6M$17.4M$23.2M$27.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 43 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.7%-13.9%-2.5%6.4%
P26
Net-to-Gross22.9%18.4%21.6%27.4%
P53
Occupancy64.9%65.1%75.1%79.9%
P23
Rev/Bed$1.7M$1.0M$1.6M$1.8M
P67
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML