Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:55 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EMORY UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
CCN 110010 | GA | 639 beds | Current EBITDA $77.5M → Pro Forma $152.4M (+$74.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.42B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$77.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$74.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$152.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$54.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$74.9M
Modeled Uplift
$52.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$22.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $52.6M (vs $74.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$28.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$28.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$17.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$911K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$74.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$28.5M$28.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$27.4M$783K$28.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.4M$13.0M$17.3M$54.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$911K$911K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$7.1M$14.2M$21.4M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M$28.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$7.0M$14.1M$21.1M$28.2M$28.2M$28.2M$28.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.8M$11.6M$17.3M$17.3M$17.3M$17.3M$17.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$456K$911K$911K$911K$911K$911K$911K
Cumulative$0$20.4M$40.8M$60.8M$74.9M$74.9M$74.9M$74.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $74.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.3x70% / 14.0x74% / 15.8x75% / 16.6x77% / 17.5x
9.0x60% / 10.6x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x
10.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.3x
11.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
12.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
34%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 34% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$77.5M$77.5M5.4%
Year 1$79.8M+$50.0M$129.8M9.1%
Year 2$82.2M+$74.9M$157.1M11.0%
Year 3$84.7M+$74.9M$159.6M11.2%
Year 4$87.2M+$74.9M$162.1M11.4%
Year 5$89.8M+$74.9M$164.7M11.6%
$774.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.81B
Exit EV (11x)
$1.04B
Value Created
$164.7M
Exit EBITDA
$123.4M
Organic Growth
$749.3M
RCM Value Creation
$164.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$14.2M$21.4M$28.5M$34.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$14.1M$21.1M$28.2M$33.8M
A/R Days Reduction$8.7M$13.0M$17.3M$20.8M
Clean Claim Rate$456K$684K$911K$1.1M
Total$37.5M$56.2M$74.9M$89.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.4%-8.5%-2.5%4.0%
P81
Net-to-Gross31.5%20.5%22.1%27.5%
P86
Occupancy83.3%74.6%79.9%87.3%
P62
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.3M$1.8M$2.4M
P57
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.3M$2.0M$2.3M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML