Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PALM POINT BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 21:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PALM POINT BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE
CCN 104082 | FL | 74 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.7M → Pro Forma $-2.2M (+$540K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$540K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-2.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+532bps
Margin Improvement
$390K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$540K
Modeled Uplift
$339K
Risk-Adjusted
-$201K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.3M (vs $0.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$204K
+201bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$203K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$124K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$540K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$196K$8K$204K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$203K$203K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$31K$92K$124K$390K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$51K$102K$153K$204K$204K$204K$204K
Cost to Collect$0$51K$102K$152K$203K$203K$203K$203K
A/R Days Reduction$0$41K$82K$124K$124K$124K$124K$124K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$148K$295K$438K$540K$540K$540K$540K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $540K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.7M$-2.7M-26.8%
Year 1$-2.8M+$360K$-2.4M-24.1%
Year 2$-2.9M+$540K$-2.3M-23.1%
Year 3$-3.0M+$540K$-2.4M-24.0%
Year 4$-3.1M+$540K$-2.5M-24.8%
Year 5$-3.2M+$540K$-2.6M-25.7%
$-27.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-28.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$-1.5M
Value Created
$-2.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.3M
Organic Growth
$5.4M
RCM Value Creation
$-2.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$102K$153K$204K$245K
Cost to Collect$102K$152K$203K$244K
A/R Days Reduction$62K$93K$124K$148K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$270K$405K$540K$648K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 119 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-26.8%-9.5%2.9%11.8%
P11
Net-to-Gross41.0%15.1%23.3%39.0%
P76
Occupancy39.6%50.2%63.8%77.3%
P13
Rev/Bed$137K$241K$530K$1.1M
P10
Exp/Bed$174K$316K$569K$1.1M
P9

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML