Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OGLETHORPE OF ORLANDO INC. 2026-04-26 12:46 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OGLETHORPE OF ORLANDO INC.
CCN 104081 | FL | 64 beds | Current EBITDA $2.4M → Pro Forma $3.0M (+$668K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$668K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+528bps
Margin Improvement
$485K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$668K
Modeled Uplift
$482K
Risk-Adjusted
-$186K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$253K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$252K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$154K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$668K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$253K$253K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$243K$8K$252K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$39K$115K$154K$485K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$63K$126K$190K$253K$253K$253K$253K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$63K$126K$189K$252K$252K$252K$252K
A/R Days Reduction$0$51K$103K$154K$154K$154K$154K$154K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$182K$364K$542K$668K$668K$668K$668K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $668K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.6x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.4M$2.4M18.7%
Year 1$2.4M+$445K$2.9M22.8%
Year 2$2.5M+$668K$3.2M25.2%
Year 3$2.6M+$668K$3.3M25.7%
Year 4$2.7M+$668K$3.3M26.4%
Year 5$2.7M+$668K$3.4M27.0%
$23.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$37.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$13.9M
Value Created
$3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$3.8M
Organic Growth
$6.7M
RCM Value Creation
$3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$126K$190K$253K$303K
Denial Rate Reductio$126K$189K$252K$302K
A/R Days Reduction$77K$115K$154K$185K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$334K$501K$668K$801K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 110 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.7%-9.4%5.0%12.8%
P87
Net-to-Gross46.5%15.7%24.5%44.1%
P77
Occupancy74.7%50.9%64.1%81.3%
P66
Rev/Bed$198K$239K$506K$1.0M
P19
Exp/Bed$161K$280K$533K$969K
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML