Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LARKIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL BEHAVIORAL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LARKIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL BEHAVIORAL
CCN 104079 | FL | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $639K → Pro Forma $1.3M (+$656K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$12.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$639K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$656K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$476K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$656K
Modeled Uplift
$462K
Risk-Adjusted
-$195K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$248K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$247K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$151K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$656K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$248K$248K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$239K$8K$247K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$38K$113K$151K$476K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$62K$124K$186K$248K$248K$248K$248K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$62K$124K$185K$247K$247K$247K$247K
A/R Days Reduction$0$50K$101K$151K$151K$151K$151K$151K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$179K$358K$532K$656K$656K$656K$656K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $656K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.8x71% / 14.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x
9.0x61% / 11.0x66% / 12.6x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x
10.0x57% / 9.6x61% / 11.0x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x
11.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
12.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
36%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 36% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$639K$639K5.1%
Year 1$658K+$438K$1.1M8.8%
Year 2$677K+$656K$1.3M10.7%
Year 3$698K+$656K$1.4M10.9%
Year 4$719K+$656K$1.4M11.1%
Year 5$740K+$656K$1.4M11.2%
$6.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$15.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$9.0M
Value Created
$1.4M
Exit EBITDA
$1.0M
Organic Growth
$6.6M
RCM Value Creation
$1.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$124K$186K$248K$298K
Denial Rate Reductio$124K$185K$247K$297K
A/R Days Reduction$76K$113K$151K$181K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$328K$492K$656K$788K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.1%-14.5%4.3%11.8%
P51
Net-to-Gross29.9%15.8%28.7%51.1%
P54
Occupancy71.5%46.8%60.6%81.5%
P61
Rev/Bed$248K$245K$502K$940K
P25
Exp/Bed$236K$299K$518K$933K
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML