Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PARK ROYAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PARK ROYAL HOSPITAL
CCN 104074 | FL | 114 beds | Current EBITDA $8.7M → Pro Forma $10.6M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$481K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$695K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$688K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$423K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$695K$695K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$669K$19K$688K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$107K$316K$423K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$174K$347K$521K$695K$695K$695K$695K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$172K$344K$516K$688K$688K$688K$688K
A/R Days Reduction$0$141K$282K$423K$423K$423K$423K$423K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$498K$996K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.7M$8.7M25.1%
Year 1$9.0M+$1.2M$10.2M29.4%
Year 2$9.3M+$1.8M$11.1M31.9%
Year 3$9.5M+$1.8M$11.4M32.7%
Year 4$9.8M+$1.8M$11.7M33.5%
Year 5$10.1M+$1.8M$11.9M34.4%
$87.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$131.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$44.1M
Value Created
$11.9M
Exit EBITDA
$13.9M
Organic Growth
$18.3M
RCM Value Creation
$11.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$347K$521K$695K$834K
Denial Rate Reductio$344K$516K$688K$826K
A/R Days Reduction$211K$317K$423K$507K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$22K$27K
Total$914K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 120 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.1%-6.5%4.8%14.5%
P90
Net-to-Gross38.6%12.6%19.9%36.8%
P80
Occupancy91.2%51.1%64.2%76.7%
P92
Rev/Bed$305K$382K$701K$1.2M
P21
Exp/Bed$228K$397K$728K$1.1M
P13

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML