Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — EMERALD COAST BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — EMERALD COAST BEHAVIORAL HOSPITAL
CCN 104073 | FL | 86 beds | Current EBITDA $2.0M → Pro Forma $3.4M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$960K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$913K
Risk-Adjusted
-$403K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$500K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$495K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$304K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$500K$500K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$482K$14K$495K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$77K$228K$304K$960K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$125K$250K$375K$500K$500K$500K$500K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$124K$248K$372K$495K$495K$495K$495K
A/R Days Reduction$0$101K$203K$304K$304K$304K$304K$304K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$358K$717K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 10.0x63% / 11.4x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x
9.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x65% / 12.4x
10.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
11.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.0M$2.0M8.1%
Year 1$2.1M+$877K$3.0M11.9%
Year 2$2.2M+$1.3M$3.5M13.9%
Year 3$2.2M+$1.3M$3.5M14.2%
Year 4$2.3M+$1.3M$3.6M14.4%
Year 5$2.4M+$1.3M$3.7M14.7%
$20.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$40.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.1M
Value Created
$3.7M
Exit EBITDA
$3.2M
Organic Growth
$13.2M
RCM Value Creation
$3.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$250K$375K$500K$600K
Denial Rate Reductio$248K$372K$495K$594K
A/R Days Reduction$152K$228K$304K$365K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$658K$987K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 121 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.1%-9.3%2.7%12.0%
P66
Net-to-Gross37.5%14.0%20.7%37.5%
P74
Occupancy69.1%48.7%62.3%77.1%
P60
Rev/Bed$291K$310K$583K$1.2M
P23
Exp/Bed$267K$345K$626K$1.1M
P19

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML