Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SPRINGBROOK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:46 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SPRINGBROOK HOSPITAL
CCN 104057 | FL | 66 beds | Current EBITDA $-813K → Pro Forma $-41K (+$772K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-813K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$772K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-41K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$562K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$772K
Modeled Uplift
$577K
Risk-Adjusted
-$195K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$293K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$291K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$178K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$772K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$293K$293K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$282K$8K$291K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$45K$133K$178K$562K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT42.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$73K$147K$220K$293K$293K$293K$293K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$73K$145K$218K$291K$291K$291K$291K
A/R Days Reduction$0$59K$119K$178K$178K$178K$178K$178K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$210K$420K$626K$772K$772K$772K$772K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $772K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-813K$-813K-5.5%
Year 1$-837K+$515K$-323K-2.2%
Year 2$-862K+$772K$-91K-0.6%
Year 3$-888K+$772K$-116K-0.8%
Year 4$-915K+$772K$-143K-1.0%
Year 5$-942K+$772K$-171K-1.2%
$-8.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$6.3M
Value Created
$-171K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.3M
Organic Growth
$7.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-171K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$147K$220K$293K$352K
Denial Rate Reductio$145K$218K$291K$349K
A/R Days Reduction$89K$134K$178K$214K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$386K$579K$772K$926K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 110 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.5%-9.4%4.7%12.8%
P29
Net-to-Gross35.4%15.7%25.2%42.1%
P63
Occupancy94.6%50.9%64.1%81.3%
P94
Rev/Bed$222K$239K$510K$1.1M
P22
Exp/Bed$234K$280K$537K$979K
P21

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML