Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CENTERSTONE OF FLORIDA INC. 2026-04-26 17:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CENTERSTONE OF FLORIDA INC.
CCN 104040 | FL | 41 beds | Current EBITDA $446K → Pro Forma $751K (+$305K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$5.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$446K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$305K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$751K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+546bps
Margin Improvement
$214K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$305K
Modeled Uplift
$204K
Risk-Adjusted
-$100K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$116K
+207bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$112K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$68K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+17bp
Total EBITDA Impact$305K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$107K$8K$116K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$112K$112K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$17K$51K$68K$214K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$29K$58K$87K$116K$116K$116K$116K
Cost to Collect$0$28K$56K$84K$112K$112K$112K$112K
A/R Days Reduction$0$23K$45K$68K$68K$68K$68K$68K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$84K$168K$248K$305K$305K$305K$305K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $305K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x64% / 11.7x68% / 13.2x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
23%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 23% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$446K$446K8.0%
Year 1$460K+$203K$663K11.9%
Year 2$473K+$305K$778K13.9%
Year 3$488K+$305K$792K14.2%
Year 4$502K+$305K$807K14.5%
Year 5$517K+$305K$822K14.7%
$4.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$9.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.6M
Value Created
$822K
Exit EBITDA
$711K
Organic Growth
$3.0M
RCM Value Creation
$822K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$58K$87K$116K$139K
Cost to Collect$56K$84K$112K$134K
A/R Days Reduction$34K$51K$68K$81K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$152K$229K$305K$366K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 80 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-18.7%2.1%11.7%
P0
Net-to-Gross45.7%18.0%29.9%60.0%
P63
Occupancy59.2%44.3%60.6%81.6%
P46
Rev/Bed$136K$237K$487K$648K
P11
Exp/Bed$472K$319K$518K$924K
P42

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML