Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FT. LAUDERDALE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FT. LAUDERDALE HOSPITAL
CCN 104026 | FL | 182 beds | Current EBITDA $7.8M → Pro Forma $10.2M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$46.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$774K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$926K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$917K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$564K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$926K$926K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$891K$25K$917K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$142K$421K$564K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT21.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$232K$463K$695K$926K$926K$926K$926K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$229K$458K$688K$917K$917K$917K$917K
A/R Days Reduction$0$188K$376K$564K$564K$564K$564K$564K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$663K$1.3M$2.0M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.8M$7.8M16.8%
Year 1$8.0M+$1.6M$9.6M20.8%
Year 2$8.2M+$2.4M$10.7M23.1%
Year 3$8.5M+$2.4M$10.9M23.6%
Year 4$8.7M+$2.4M$11.2M24.2%
Year 5$9.0M+$2.4M$11.4M24.7%
$77.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$125.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$48.2M
Value Created
$11.4M
Exit EBITDA
$12.4M
Organic Growth
$24.4M
RCM Value Creation
$11.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$463K$695K$926K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$458K$688K$917K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$282K$423K$564K$676K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 124 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.8%-6.5%2.8%16.8%
P74
Net-to-Gross42.1%10.1%15.1%21.7%
P97
Occupancy68.9%52.3%63.9%75.5%
P64
Rev/Bed$254K$700K$1.1M$1.3M
P7
Exp/Bed$212K$664K$918K$1.2M
P5

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML