Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL 2026-04-27 01:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTH FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL
CCN 104001 | FL | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $142K → Pro Forma $251K (+$109K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 104001

SOUTH FLORIDA STATE HOSPITAL
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$1.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$142K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$109K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$251K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+615bps
Margin Improvement
$68K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$109K
Modeled Uplift
$82K
Risk-Adjusted
-$27K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$42K
+239bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$35K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$22K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+54bp
Total EBITDA Impact$109K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$34K$8K$42K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$5K$16K$22K$68K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$11K$21K$32K$42K$42K$42K$42K
Cost to Collect$0$9K$18K$27K$35K$35K$35K$35K
A/R Days Reduction$0$7K$14K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$31K$63K$90K$109K$109K$109K$109K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $109K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.8x66% / 12.4x69% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
9.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x
10.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x
11.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
12.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$142K$142K8.0%
Year 1$146K+$73K$219K12.3%
Year 2$150K+$109K$259K14.6%
Year 3$155K+$109K$264K14.9%
Year 4$160K+$109K$269K15.2%
Year 5$164K+$109K$273K15.4%
$1.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.6M
Value Created
$273K
Exit EBITDA
$226K
Organic Growth
$1.1M
RCM Value Creation
$273K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$21K$32K$42K$51K
Cost to Collect$18K$27K$35K$43K
A/R Days Reduction$11K$16K$22K$26K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$54K$82K$109K$131K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-14.5%4.3%11.8%
P0
Net-to-Gross100.0%15.8%28.7%51.1%
P98
Occupancy99.2%46.8%60.6%81.5%
P98
Rev/Bed$35K$245K$502K$940K
P1
Exp/Bed$785K$299K$518K$933K
P70

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML