Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHABILIATION HOSPITAL OF NAPLES 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHABILIATION HOSPITAL OF NAPLES
CCN 103054 | FL | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $-161K → Pro Forma $111K (+$272K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$4.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-161K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$272K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$111K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+550bps
Margin Improvement
$189K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$272K
Modeled Uplift
$187K
Risk-Adjusted
-$85K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$103K
+209bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$99K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$60K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+19bp
Total EBITDA Impact$272K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$95K$8K$103K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$99K$99K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$15K$45K$60K$189K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$26K$52K$77K$103K$103K$103K$103K
Cost to Collect$0$25K$49K$74K$99K$99K$99K$99K
A/R Days Reduction$0$20K$40K$60K$60K$60K$60K$60K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$75K$151K$221K$272K$272K$272K$272K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $272K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-12.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
18.8x
Headroom (turns)
289%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 289% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -12.3x, adding 111.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-161K$-161K-3.3%
Year 1$-166K+$181K$16K0.3%
Year 2$-171K+$272K$101K2.0%
Year 3$-176K+$272K$96K1.9%
Year 4$-181K+$272K$91K1.8%
Year 5$-186K+$272K$85K1.7%
$-1.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$938K
Exit EV (11x)
$2.5M
Value Created
$85K
Exit EBITDA
$-256K
Organic Growth
$2.7M
RCM Value Creation
$85K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$52K$77K$103K$124K
Cost to Collect$49K$74K$99K$118K
A/R Days Reduction$30K$45K$60K$72K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$136K$204K$272K$326K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.3%-14.5%4.3%11.8%
P33
Net-to-Gross66.0%15.8%28.7%51.1%
P83
Occupancy60.8%46.8%60.6%81.5%
P50
Rev/Bed$99K$245K$502K$940K
P5
Exp/Bed$102K$299K$518K$933K
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML