Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103050 | FL | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $1.4M → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$378K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$7.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$378K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+540bps
Margin Improvement
$269K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$378K
Modeled Uplift
$247K
Risk-Adjusted
-$131K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$143K
+204bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$140K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$85K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+14bp
Total EBITDA Impact$378K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$135K$8K$143K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$140K$140K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$22K$64K$85K$269K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$36K$72K$107K$143K$143K$143K$143K
Cost to Collect$0$35K$70K$105K$140K$140K$140K$140K
A/R Days Reduction$0$28K$57K$85K$85K$85K$85K$85K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$104K$208K$307K$378K$378K$378K$378K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $378K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x
11.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
12.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.4M$1.4M19.5%
Year 1$1.4M+$252K$1.7M23.7%
Year 2$1.5M+$378K$1.8M26.1%
Year 3$1.5M+$378K$1.9M26.7%
Year 4$1.5M+$378K$1.9M27.4%
Year 5$1.6M+$378K$2.0M28.0%
$13.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$21.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$7.9M
Value Created
$2.0M
Exit EBITDA
$2.2M
Organic Growth
$3.8M
RCM Value Creation
$2.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$72K$107K$143K$172K
Cost to Collect$70K$105K$140K$168K
A/R Days Reduction$43K$64K$85K$102K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$189K$284K$378K$454K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin19.5%-14.5%4.3%11.8%
P90
Net-to-Gross60.0%15.8%28.7%51.1%
P78
Occupancy41.2%46.8%60.6%81.5%
P19
Rev/Bed$140K$245K$502K$940K
P13
Exp/Bed$113K$299K$518K$933K
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML