Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION OF P 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION OF P
CCN 103048 | FL | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $578K → Pro Forma $1.5M (+$904K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$17.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$578K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$904K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$659K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$904K
Modeled Uplift
$650K
Risk-Adjusted
-$254K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$344K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$340K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$209K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$11K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$904K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$344K$344K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$331K$9K$340K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$53K$156K$209K$659K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$11K$11K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT60.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$86K$172K$258K$344K$344K$344K$344K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$85K$170K$255K$340K$340K$340K$340K
A/R Days Reduction$0$70K$139K$209K$209K$209K$209K$209K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
Cumulative$0$246K$492K$733K$904K$904K$904K$904K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $904K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x76% / 16.7x80% / 18.9x84% / 21.1x86% / 22.2x88% / 23.3x
9.0x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.4x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x83% / 20.4x
10.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.2x76% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x
11.0x62% / 11.2x67% / 12.8x71% / 14.4x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.1x
12.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.2x
Headroom (turns)
49%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 49% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.3x, adding 5.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$578K$578K3.4%
Year 1$596K+$603K$1.2M7.0%
Year 2$613K+$904K$1.5M8.8%
Year 3$632K+$904K$1.5M8.9%
Year 4$651K+$904K$1.6M9.0%
Year 5$670K+$904K$1.6M9.2%
$5.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$11.5M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$921K
Organic Growth
$9.0M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$172K$258K$344K$412K
Denial Rate Reductio$170K$255K$340K$408K
A/R Days Reduction$105K$157K$209K$251K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$11K$13K
Total$452K$678K$904K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 79 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.4%-18.7%1.8%11.8%
P55
Net-to-Gross61.4%19.6%33.8%60.0%
P77
Occupancy73.6%43.7%60.4%81.7%
P63
Rev/Bed$430K$235K$481K$639K
P42
Exp/Bed$415K$316K$510K$939K
P34

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML