Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 06:48 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103047 | FL | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $1.3M → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$25.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$963K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$993K
Risk-Adjusted
-$328K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$502K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$497K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$306K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$502K$502K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$484K$14K$497K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$77K$229K$306K$963K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$126K$251K$377K$502K$502K$502K$502K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$124K$249K$373K$497K$497K$497K$497K
A/R Days Reduction$0$102K$204K$306K$306K$306K$306K$306K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$360K$720K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x66% / 12.7x71% / 14.4x75% / 16.2x76% / 17.1x78% / 18.0x
9.0x61% / 10.9x66% / 12.5x70% / 14.0x71% / 14.8x73% / 15.6x
10.0x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.9x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x
11.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x
12.0x49% / 7.3x54% / 8.5x58% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.3x
Headroom (turns)
35%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 35% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.2x, adding 4.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.3M$1.3M5.2%
Year 1$1.3M+$881K$2.2M8.8%
Year 2$1.4M+$1.3M$2.7M10.8%
Year 3$1.4M+$1.3M$2.7M10.9%
Year 4$1.5M+$1.3M$2.8M11.1%
Year 5$1.5M+$1.3M$2.8M11.3%
$13.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$18.1M
Value Created
$2.8M
Exit EBITDA
$2.1M
Organic Growth
$13.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$251K$377K$502K$603K
Denial Rate Reductio$249K$373K$497K$597K
A/R Days Reduction$153K$229K$306K$367K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$661K$991K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 96 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.2%-14.5%4.3%11.8%
P53
Net-to-Gross60.2%15.8%28.7%51.1%
P80
Occupancy89.1%46.8%60.6%81.5%
P84
Rev/Bed$502K$245K$502K$940K
P49
Exp/Bed$476K$299K$518K$933K
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML