Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ARCHER REHABILITATION LLC 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ARCHER REHABILITATION LLC
CCN 103046 | FL | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $418K → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$418K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$451K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$654K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$648K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$398K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$654K$654K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$630K$18K$648K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$100K$298K$398K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$164K$327K$491K$654K$654K$654K$654K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$162K$324K$486K$648K$648K$648K$648K
A/R Days Reduction$0$133K$265K$398K$398K$398K$398K$398K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$469K$937K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x104% / 35.3x109% / 39.6x113% / 43.9x115% / 46.0x117% / 48.2x
9.0x99% / 31.1x103% / 34.9x108% / 38.7x110% / 40.6x112% / 42.5x
10.0x94% / 27.6x99% / 31.1x103% / 34.5x105% / 36.2x107% / 37.9x
11.0x90% / 24.8x95% / 27.9x99% / 31.1x101% / 32.6x103% / 34.2x
12.0x86% / 22.5x91% / 25.3x95% / 28.2x97% / 29.6x99% / 31.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.8x
Headroom (turns)
75%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 75% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.7x, adding 6.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$418K$418K1.3%
Year 1$431K+$1.1M$1.6M4.8%
Year 2$443K+$1.7M$2.2M6.6%
Year 3$457K+$1.7M$2.2M6.7%
Year 4$470K+$1.7M$2.2M6.7%
Year 5$485K+$1.7M$2.2M6.7%
$4.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$24.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.1M
Value Created
$2.2M
Exit EBITDA
$666K
Organic Growth
$17.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$327K$491K$654K$785K
Denial Rate Reductio$324K$486K$648K$777K
A/R Days Reduction$199K$299K$398K$478K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$16K$21K$25K
Total$860K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin1.3%-10.1%5.0%13.1%
P40
Net-to-Gross28.7%15.6%25.2%44.1%
P54
Occupancy83.7%49.0%63.8%81.3%
P79
Rev/Bed$545K$239K$504K$972K
P55
Exp/Bed$538K$268K$527K$935K
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML