Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103044 | FL | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $13.9M → Pro Forma $16.4M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$47.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$16.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$592K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.9M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$947K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$938K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$576K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$947K$947K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$912K$26K$938K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$145K$431K$576K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$237K$474K$710K$947K$947K$947K$947K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$234K$469K$703K$938K$938K$938K$938K
A/R Days Reduction$0$192K$384K$576K$576K$576K$576K$576K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$678K$1.4M$2.0M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
9.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.3x
10.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
11.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.0x36% / 4.7x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.7x
Headroom (turns)
-10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.2x, adding 1.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.9M$13.9M29.4%
Year 1$14.3M+$1.7M$16.0M33.8%
Year 2$14.8M+$2.5M$17.2M36.4%
Year 3$15.2M+$2.5M$17.7M37.3%
Year 4$15.7M+$2.5M$18.1M38.3%
Year 5$16.1M+$2.5M$18.6M39.3%
$139.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$204.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$65.7M
Value Created
$18.6M
Exit EBITDA
$22.1M
Organic Growth
$24.9M
RCM Value Creation
$18.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$474K$710K$947K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$469K$703K$938K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$288K$432K$576K$691K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$30K$36K
Total$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 123 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin29.4%-10.0%2.8%11.8%
P95
Net-to-Gross76.2%15.3%22.5%38.6%
P97
Occupancy96.3%50.2%63.5%77.2%
P96
Rev/Bed$592K$247K$550K$1.1M
P53
Exp/Bed$418K$324K$574K$1.1M
P32

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML