Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:10 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103038 | FL | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $3.4M → Pro Forma $4.8M (+$1.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$26.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$4.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.4M
Modeled Uplift
$998K
Risk-Adjusted
-$398K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$531K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$526K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$323K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$17K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$531K$531K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$511K$15K$526K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$81K$242K$323K$1.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$17K$17K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT44.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$133K$265K$398K$531K$531K$531K$531K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$131K$263K$394K$526K$526K$526K$526K
A/R Days Reduction$0$108K$215K$323K$323K$323K$323K$323K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K$17K
Cumulative$0$380K$761K$1.1M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.1x
9.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
10.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
11.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
12.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.5x
Headroom (turns)
8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.0x, adding 2.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.4M$3.4M12.7%
Year 1$3.5M+$931K$4.4M16.6%
Year 2$3.6M+$1.4M$5.0M18.7%
Year 3$3.7M+$1.4M$5.1M19.1%
Year 4$3.8M+$1.4M$5.2M19.5%
Year 5$3.9M+$1.4M$5.3M20.0%
$33.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$58.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.6M
Value Created
$5.3M
Exit EBITDA
$5.4M
Organic Growth
$14.0M
RCM Value Creation
$5.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$265K$398K$531K$637K
Denial Rate Reductio$263K$394K$526K$631K
A/R Days Reduction$161K$242K$323K$388K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$13K$17K$20K
Total$698K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 106 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.7%-10.1%5.0%13.1%
P73
Net-to-Gross68.1%15.6%25.2%44.1%
P86
Occupancy75.8%49.0%63.8%81.3%
P67
Rev/Bed$442K$239K$504K$972K
P44
Exp/Bed$386K$268K$527K$935K
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML