Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:15 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103037 | FL | 70 beds | Current EBITDA $6.3M → Pro Forma $8.1M (+$1.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$34.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.8M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$466K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $1.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$687K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$680K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$418K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$22K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$687K$687K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$661K$19K$680K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$105K$313K$418K$1.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$22K$22K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT40.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$172K$344K$515K$687K$687K$687K$687K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$170K$340K$510K$680K$680K$680K$680K
A/R Days Reduction$0$139K$279K$418K$418K$418K$418K$418K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K$22K
Cumulative$0$492K$984K$1.5M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
9.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.3M$6.3M18.3%
Year 1$6.5M+$1.2M$7.7M22.3%
Year 2$6.7M+$1.8M$8.5M24.6%
Year 3$6.9M+$1.8M$8.7M25.2%
Year 4$7.1M+$1.8M$8.9M25.8%
Year 5$7.3M+$1.8M$9.1M26.4%
$62.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$100.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.2M
Value Created
$9.1M
Exit EBITDA
$10.0M
Organic Growth
$18.1M
RCM Value Creation
$9.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$344K$515K$687K$825K
Denial Rate Reductio$340K$510K$680K$816K
A/R Days Reduction$209K$314K$418K$502K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$16K$22K$26K
Total$904K$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 115 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.3%-9.5%3.6%12.5%
P85
Net-to-Gross77.0%15.5%24.3%40.2%
P97
Occupancy89.9%51.3%63.9%78.1%
P90
Rev/Bed$491K$241K$515K$1.1M
P46
Exp/Bed$401K$316K$567K$1.1M
P31

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML