Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SEA PINES REHABILITATION HOSPITAL A 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SEA PINES REHABILITATION HOSPITAL A
CCN 103034 | FL | 90 beds | Current EBITDA $8.5M → Pro Forma $10.4M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$581K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$753K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$745K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$458K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$753K$753K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$725K$21K$745K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$343K$458K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$188K$376K$565K$753K$753K$753K$753K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$186K$373K$559K$745K$745K$745K$745K
A/R Days Reduction$0$153K$305K$458K$458K$458K$458K$458K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$539K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.1x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.5M$8.5M22.5%
Year 1$8.7M+$1.3M$10.0M26.6%
Year 2$9.0M+$2.0M$11.0M29.1%
Year 3$9.2M+$2.0M$11.2M29.8%
Year 4$9.5M+$2.0M$11.5M30.5%
Year 5$9.8M+$2.0M$11.8M31.3%
$84.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$129.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.1M
Value Created
$11.8M
Exit EBITDA
$13.5M
Organic Growth
$19.8M
RCM Value Creation
$11.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$376K$565K$753K$904K
Denial Rate Reductio$373K$559K$745K$895K
A/R Days Reduction$229K$344K$458K$550K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$990K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 121 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.5%-8.5%3.2%12.7%
P90
Net-to-Gross68.9%14.0%20.6%37.5%
P91
Occupancy73.6%49.2%63.5%77.4%
P68
Rev/Bed$418K$310K$583K$1.2M
P32
Exp/Bed$324K$345K$626K$1.1M
P23

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML