Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103033 | FL | 76 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $3.9M (+$1.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$885K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.2M
Modeled Uplift
$811K
Risk-Adjusted
-$403K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$462K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$457K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$281K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$462K$462K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$444K$13K$457K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$71K$210K$281K$885K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$115K$231K$346K$462K$462K$462K$462K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$114K$229K$343K$457K$457K$457K$457K
A/R Days Reduction$0$94K$187K$281K$281K$281K$281K$281K
Clean Claim Rate$0$7K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$331K$661K$985K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x60% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x
11.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M11.8%
Year 1$2.8M+$810K$3.6M15.7%
Year 2$2.9M+$1.2M$4.1M17.8%
Year 3$3.0M+$1.2M$4.2M18.2%
Year 4$3.1M+$1.2M$4.3M18.6%
Year 5$3.2M+$1.2M$4.4M19.0%
$27.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$48.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$20.9M
Value Created
$4.4M
Exit EBITDA
$4.4M
Organic Growth
$12.1M
RCM Value Creation
$4.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$231K$346K$462K$554K
Denial Rate Reductio$229K$343K$457K$548K
A/R Days Reduction$140K$211K$281K$337K
Clean Claim Rate$7K$11K$15K$18K
Total$607K$911K$1.2M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 121 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.8%-9.3%2.9%11.8%
P75
Net-to-Gross71.5%15.1%22.5%38.6%
P92
Occupancy53.9%50.8%63.8%77.4%
P32
Rev/Bed$304K$243K$545K$1.1M
P27
Exp/Bed$268K$323K$572K$1.1M
P22

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML