Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 103032 | FL | 80 beds | Current EBITDA $4.9M → Pro Forma $6.6M (+$1.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$32.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$1.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$493K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$650K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$643K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$395K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$21K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$650K$650K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$625K$18K$643K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$100K$296K$395K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$21K$21K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$162K$325K$487K$650K$650K$650K$650K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$161K$322K$482K$643K$643K$643K$643K
A/R Days Reduction$0$132K$264K$395K$395K$395K$395K$395K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K$21K
Cumulative$0$465K$931K$1.4M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.9M$4.9M14.9%
Year 1$5.0M+$1.1M$6.1M18.9%
Year 2$5.1M+$1.7M$6.9M21.1%
Year 3$5.3M+$1.7M$7.0M21.6%
Year 4$5.5M+$1.7M$7.2M22.1%
Year 5$5.6M+$1.7M$7.3M22.6%
$48.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$80.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$32.1M
Value Created
$7.3M
Exit EBITDA
$7.7M
Organic Growth
$17.1M
RCM Value Creation
$7.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$325K$487K$650K$780K
Denial Rate Reductio$322K$482K$643K$772K
A/R Days Reduction$198K$296K$395K$474K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$16K$21K$25K
Total$854K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 123 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.9%-10.0%2.8%11.8%
P81
Net-to-Gross73.7%15.3%22.5%38.6%
P96
Occupancy71.2%50.2%63.5%77.2%
P63
Rev/Bed$406K$247K$550K$1.1M
P33
Exp/Bed$345K$324K$574K$1.1M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML