Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOS 2026-04-26 14:09 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOS
CCN 103028 | FL | 126 beds | Current EBITDA $5.6M → Pro Forma $8.2M (+$2.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$48.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$2.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$764K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$964K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$954K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$586K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$31K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$964K$964K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$928K$26K$954K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$148K$439K$586K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$31K$31K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT34.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$241K$482K$723K$964K$964K$964K$964K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$239K$477K$716K$954K$954K$954K$954K
A/R Days Reduction$0$195K$391K$586K$586K$586K$586K$586K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K$31K
Cumulative$0$690K$1.4M$2.1M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.5x58% / 9.8x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.4x
9.0x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x
10.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
11.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
12.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
10%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 10% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.6M$5.6M11.7%
Year 1$5.8M+$1.7M$7.5M15.6%
Year 2$6.0M+$2.5M$8.5M17.7%
Year 3$6.2M+$2.5M$8.7M18.0%
Year 4$6.3M+$2.5M$8.9M18.4%
Year 5$6.5M+$2.5M$9.1M18.8%
$56.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$99.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$43.4M
Value Created
$9.1M
Exit EBITDA
$9.0M
Organic Growth
$25.4M
RCM Value Creation
$9.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$482K$723K$964K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$477K$716K$954K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$293K$440K$586K$704K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$23K$31K$37K
Total$1.3M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 122 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.7%-5.5%5.3%16.0%
P66
Net-to-Gross62.3%10.6%18.5%34.0%
P91
Occupancy70.5%50.8%63.8%75.4%
P66
Rev/Bed$382K$394K$860K$1.3M
P24
Exp/Bed$338K$422K$818K$1.1M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML